At work dinners or birthdays, dessert is a liability I can’t afford; a single slice of cake manifests on my jawline within forty-eight hours, usually just in time for a Thursday pitch.
I have PCOS, which means my skin doesn’t glow without intervention and my weight doesn’t respond to casual effort. Stress doesn’t just sit in my chest, it erupts across my jawline within two days. Every deadline, every tense conversation, every boardroom presentation carries a visible tax that announces itself before I’ve said a word.
Some people wake up with clear skin. I wake up and start damage control. There are the dermatologist appointments, the ingredient audits, the eliminated food groups, the supplement graveyard accumulating under my sink. I stand in front of the mirror at 6 a.m. doing skincare like I’m prepping for surgery, and it’s a second job. When it works, it looks effortless.
People see the outcome and assume it’s genetic luck. They don’t see the hourly discipline required to keep your body from defaulting to chaos. Women with PCOS spend twice as long on appearance maintenance as women without it, and the baseline requires engineering. But the effort pays, just under a different name.
The first time I walked into a boardroom with clear skin, tailored clothes, and the right lipstick, the dynamic shifted before I opened my mouth. I was the same person who’d presented three months earlier in a decent but unremarkable outfit, skin flaring, hair doing its own thing. Same slides, same data, different reception. This time, people leaned in. My points landed faster, and the follow-up questions had a different tone. Curious instead of patronising, testing turned into genuine interest.
I wasn’t smarter that day. I was just better packaged, and that’s when I stopped treating my appearance like a personality trait and started treating it like infrastructure.
Looking put together buys you time, attention, and the benefit of the doubt, especially if you’re a woman in a room full of men. Especially on Instagram where people decide in three seconds whether you’re worth listening to. Intelligence matters, but presentation determines whether anyone stays long enough to notice it. Attractive people get perceived as more competent before speaking a single word, and women who wear makeup earn roughly 30% more than those who don’t. The halo effect is real, measurable, and profitable.
When I show up polished now with clear skin, a tailored outfit, and hair that looks intentional, I’m taken seriously faster. My content gets more engagement, boardrooms give me more runway before interrupting, and pitches land differently. It’s not fair, but it’s also not deniable.
Hotness, or even just put-togetherness, is social currency. In a world where first impressions happen in seconds, it’s the currency that gets you into the room where your actual skills can do the work. People with naturally good skin and cooperative metabolisms don’t think about this as strategy because for them, it’s ambient. They’ve never had to engineer the advantage, so they don’t register it as one. When your biology is uncooperative, you see it clearly. Presentation is a tool, and like any tool, it costs something to build and maintain.
There’s the dermatologist rotation, the tracked macros, the disciplined refusals at dinners whilst everyone else orders dessert. I spent Dh10,000 on my skin last year, and none of it went to luxury facials. All of it went to fixing what my hormones keep breaking. Some people get the advantage for free. I had to build it from scratch.
Join me for more dispatches on the business of being
Once you start treating hotness as strategy, you can’t unsee the hierarchy. You notice which women in the room know this game, the ones who’ve clearly done the maths on tailoring, skin, hair. The ones who show up polished in a way that looks accidental but costs hours. You recognise the work because you do it too.
You also notice the ones who don’t. The brilliant women with ideas that should command the room but don’t, the ones still operating under the belief that competence is enough. The ones who haven’t yet learnt that being right matters less than being heard, and being heard often requires looking the part first.
There’s a silent sorting that happens, a parallel hierarchy that runs alongside competence. It’s uncomfortable to name because naming it makes you complicit, but you are complicit. You’ve weaponised the same system that punishes other women for not playing. You’ve turned your appearance into leverage, which means you’ve validated the idea that appearance should be leverage at all.
You’re both victim and beneficiary. You’ve gamed a system you didn’t create, but your success doesn’t dismantle it. If anything, it reinforces the rules for everyone else. The women who refuse to play don’t get credit for integrity. They just get less airtime.
The world rewards people who look a certain way, and that’s an economic reality. Good skin, a decent body, the appearance of health, these things open doors. They buy you attention in a saturated market, reduce friction in negotiations, and let you be heard faster. The people who were born with clear skin and fast metabolisms get the advantage without the invoice. They don’t have to budget for dermatologists or recalculate their entire diet around insulin resistance. The game is tilted.
“You can’t get mad at the scoreboard.” That line landed differently once I stopped arguing with reality and started working with it. I spent too long resenting the effort, wishing my body would just cooperate, wishing the world cared more about substance than presentation. It was exhausting and it changed nothing.
The strategy worked, maybe too well. Now I can’t tell anymore. Did that pitch land because the idea was good or because I looked the part? Is my content engaging because I’m saying something useful or because people click on a polished face? Did the room lean in because I earned it or because my appearance bought me three extra seconds of attention I then had to scramble to justify?
The advantage I built created a new kind of uncertainty. I wanted credibility, but what I got was conditional credibility, the kind that requires maintenance.
As a founder, the trap gets tighter. I’m building a gut health company whilst managing PCOS, and the stress of fundraising, of product development, of proving the business can scale, it all shows up on my face within 48 hours. In early-stage fundraising, I’m not just pitching an idea. I’m pitching myself as someone who can execute, and investors fund people they believe can handle pressure. If the pressure is visible on your face, the credibility slips before you’ve talked about unit economics.
Male founders get to look stressed and dishevelled, and it reads as scrappy, committed, in the trenches. When I show up with flared skin, it reads as someone who can’t handle it.
If I miss a dermatologist appointment, if stress breaks through the routine, if my skin flares for a week, does the credibility slip? If I show up to a pitch looking tired, does the same data suddenly sound less convincing? I’ll never know because the experiment can’t be run in reverse.
There’s also the exhausting vigilance. The people who were born with the advantage get to be inconsistent. They can have an off day, and their credibility isn’t tied to whether their skin cooperates that week. Mine is.
I’ve won by playing the game, but winning didn’t free me from it. It just raised the stakes. Now I can’t afford to stop because the infrastructure I built isn’t optional anymore. It’s load-bearing, and the worst part is that I can’t decide if I’m angry about the trap or just angry that I noticed it.
I still treat it like every other business cost. Necessary, annoying, non-negotiable. The skincare routine is overhead, the disciplined eating is maintenance, the tailored clothes are uniform. Being hot, or even just being visibly put together, doesn’t make you interesting. It makes people pause long enough to find out if you are.
I’ve weaponised my appearance. I’ve turned biology into leverage and played the game well enough to win rooms I deserve to be in. But knowing the rules doesn’t mean I respect them, and winning doesn’t feel like I thought it would. It feels like I’ve bought a ticket to a game I can’t ever leave. The same strategic choice that opened doors also locked me into maintaining them. The advantage compounds, but so does the cost.
I’m building a company that sells gut health whilst my gut actively betrays me. I’ve turned my body’s dysfunction into market insight, which means my business model depends on the same biological chaos I’m spending Dh10,000 a year trying to control. The strategy worked, and the credibility is real. The rooms opened.
The trap just got more expensive.
I'm Lakshmi, and I'm building GUTSY, a gut health company born from my own biological chaos. Subscribe to follow the build, the science, and the strategy.